Equal footing in voting

Once again, it is not immediately clear in the voting booklet what is being voted on!
The words "Certificate, Mass Surveillance, Discrimination or Extension of Executive Power". are completely missing from the introductory text to the vote on 28 November.
This is a gross deception of the sovereign and we demand fair conditions in voting, namely that

  • the information in the printed and online basic description clearly shows at first glance what the vote is about.

  • the initiators are involved in the detailed description so that ALL information AND consequences of the vote are disclosed. No more misleading, propaganda by the authorities or half-truths!

  • the Federal Council adheres to the legal requirements such as "proportionality" and "objectivity" when providing information to voters.

  • the Federal Council does not use its financial, personnel and media superiority against the political rights of the sovereign in referendum campaigns and takes care of the principle of "equal terms".

  • Parliamentarians should exercise their legal duty of control with greater vigilance and sensitivity to the information policy of the Swiss government.


We demand our constitutional and legal rights with this petition!

Thank you for joining us.



Initial situation

The text for the voting question on 28 November 2021 reads:

Do you want to accept the amendment of 19 March 2021 to the Federal Act on the legal basis for ordinances of the Federal Council to deal with the Covid 19 epidemic (Covid 19 Act) (hardship cases, unemployment insurance, supplementary family childcare, cultural workers, events)?

This had already been objected to by the Federal Chancellery in the run-up to the vote. The Federal Chancellery justified itself with the fact that the title of the amendment was chosen in parliament. The title was misleading from the start.

The Federal Council and the Federal Administration intervene in the opinion-forming process of the electorate in referendums at massive expense and with every conceivable means. The power imbalance between the Federal Council on the one hand and the referendum committees on the other is critically skewed. In short: unequal spars are facing each other in the referendum battles. Therefore, the ban on misleading voters and the ban on official propaganda must be demanded by the Swiss sovereign.

Already in the explanatory notes of the Federal Council, in the red voting booklet, the voting committees are disadvantaged. They are given hardly any space to present their position, while the Federal Council is given many times more opportunities to provide information.

This disproportion contradicts the legal requirements, because the Federal Council would be obliged to uphold the principle of "proportionality" when "informing those entitled to vote". By law, the Federal Council is only allowed to include "a brief, factual explanation" for its statement on a voting proposal. 

The Federal Council is also obliged to observe the principle of "completeness" and thus to indicate the full context of a bill as well as the consequences of a positive or a negative vote.


Essentially, the "Federal Act on Political Rights" (Bundesgesetz über die politischen Rechte, BPR) regulates the normative requirements for the Federal Council's information policy in referendum campaigns, which also includes the explanatory statement on the referendum.

"Art. 10a20 Information for voters

1 The Federal Council continuously informs the electorate about the federal voting proposals. 

2 In doing so, it shall observe the principles of completeness, objectivity, transparency and proportionality. 

3 It sets out the main positions taken in the parliamentary decision-making process. 

4 It does not represent a voting recommendation that deviates from the position of the Federal Assembly. 

Art. 11 Voting proposal, ballot papers and explanations21

2 The voting proposal shall be accompanied by a brief, factual explanation by the Federal Council, which shall also take into account the views of significant minorities. The voting proposal must contain the wording of the questions asked on the ballot paper. For popular initiatives and referendums, the author committees shall communicate their arguments to the Federal Council; the latter shall take them into account in its explanatory statement on the vote. The Federal Council may amend or reject statements that are defamatory, blatantly untruthful or too long. References to electronic sources may only be included in the explanatory statement on the vote if the originator of the references declares in writing that these sources do not contain any unlawful content and do not lead to electronic publications of unlawful content."

1 See: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1978/688_688_688/de

Referendum or initiative committees, the so-called author committees, may, on the basis of the "Federal Act on Political Rights", set out their position in the explanatory memorandum to the referendum, the so-called referendum booklet. The statement of the authors' committees is regulated in terms of quantity (2500 characters, approx. one and a half A5 pages) and content. This structurally disadvantages the statement of the authors' committees and violates the principle of "proportionality" and "objectivity" in informing voters.

The basic prerequisite of democratic processes is to guarantee the free and undistorted formation of opinion. This is the responsibility of the responsible citizen, especially in referendums. If the opinion-forming of the voting population is influenced one-sidedly by a central and official means of information, there is a fundamental democratic theoretical grievance.

The explanatory notes on the referendum on the Covid 19 law were a particularly blatant example of incomplete and manipulative information. The voters were not informed that the law had already been extended in two sessions with serious amendments. Although the amendments to the law were not the direct subject of the referendum proposal, a "no" vote would have rejected the Covid 19 law with all its amendments. This decisive information was deliberately withheld from the voters. If the Federal Council provides false information about the scope of the bill, it violates its duty to provide objective information,2 which federal law has also held in its jurisprudence.3

But it was not the only non-information. The sovereign was also not informed about the fact that the basic architecture of the law would remain in force for ten years longer. Most voters mistakenly believed that the law would end in 2021.

In view of these information gaps, which were essential for the vote, and in view of the fact that the legislator, i.e. the parliament, ignored the requirement of "unity of matter" when drafting the law - as is obligatory for initiatives - and in view of the late voting date due to the urgent decision of the parliament, the voting proposal was extremely confusing and unclear for the voters. The right to complete and transparent information was massively violated. During the referendum campaign, it was up to the referendum committee to correct the incomplete and manipulative explanations of the Federal Council and to fight against this disinformation policy.

2 Swiss Federal Constitutional Law, 10th edition, p. 440
3 "In the sense of a certain completeness, however, the requirement of objectivity dictates that important elements for the decision of the voter be suppressed in the explanatory statement, that facts important for the formation of opinion be concealed or that arguments of opposing referendum or initiative committees be misrepresented". (BGE 139 I 2 E. 6.2, Commune of Freienbach)

Even in the digital age, the voting booklet plays a decisive role in the referendum campaign, as it is appreciated by the population despite various information possibilities of the sovereign and is widely used as teaching material in political education in educational institutions.4

This source of information must be placed in the context of all information possibilities of the Federal Council with the support of its "communication experts" in order to realistically weight the power imbalance between the executive, i.e. the Federal Council, plus the Federal Administration with hundreds of so-called communication experts and the author committees. Other official information channels are only listed here in summary form: Explanatory videos on youtube, dossiers on admin.ch, press releases, Twitter appearance of the Federal Council spokesperson, press conferences, participation in panel discussions, to mention only the best known. Through these information channels, the Federal Council's statements are usually transferred unfiltered by the media to the general public.

4 The circulation of the voting booklet is 6 million copies. The VOX analysis of June 2021 also shows that over 80% of the voters use the explanations of vote.

The explanatory statement on the vote is usually prepared by a working group chaired by the Federal Chancellor with representatives of the relevant departments and specialists from the Federal Chancellery. As a rule, a draft that has been revised twice is submitted to the Federal Council. After an initial discussion, a possibly revised version is formally adopted by the Federal Council. The Voting Booklet is thus understood as an "acte de gouvernement" and is therefore not subject to appeal.

The structure of the voting booklet is prescribed by the Federal Chancellery. The initiative or referendum committee is allowed about one and a half A5 pages. As a rule, the political statement of the Federal Council and the parliament is about the same length. However, the Federal Council's position is also included on approximately four A5 pages in the presentation of the referendum bill by setting priorities, additional explanations and comments.

On 1 June 2005, the Swiss population (turnout = 39.51%) clearly rejected this popular initiative with a No vote of 75.2%. The following amendment to the BV was proposed:

"The initiative demands an amendment to Article 34 of the Federal Constitution on the guarantee of political rights. The information activities of the Federal Council and the Federal Administration before votes are to be prohibited, with a few exceptions. The following measures are proposed:

- Prohibition of information and propaganda activities for the Federal Council, the top cadres of the Federal Administration and the federal offices in the run-up to votes. A one-off brief information to the population by the head of the department responsible remains permissible. 

- Prohibition of the financing, implementation and support of information and voting campaigns as well as the production, publication and financing of information and propaganda material by all federal authorities in the run-up to votes. The exception is a factual brochure containing the Federal Council's explanations to those entitled to vote, which must give balanced consideration to the arguments in favour and those against.

- Requirement for the Confederation, cantons and communes to publish voting dates at least six months in advance.
- Requirement for the Confederation, cantons and communes to make the voting documents available to voters free of charge together with the applicable legal bases.

- The legislature shall order sanctions for the violation of political rights within two years of the adoption of the initiative."5

The initiative demanded that the Federal Council and the Federal Administration be allowed to use only the voting booklet as an official source of information. According to the initiators, this must be balanced and factual. The explanatory notes on the vote would be permitted in accordance with Art. 11a CPD. The initiative committee did not make any further demands on the voting booklet. It goes without saying that the Federal Council and the Federal Assembly had recommended that the initiative be rejected. If this initiative were to be put to the vote today, the result would most likely be different.

5 From the "Message on the popular initiative "People's sovereignty instead of propaganda by the authorities" of 29 June 2005", p. 4374

It is one of the core constitutional tasks of Parliament to control the work of the Federal Council. Art. 169 of the Federal Constitution requires that the National Council and the Council of States exercise supreme supervision over the Federal Council and the Federal Administration.6 In the past, for example, there were only very isolated parliamentary initiatives criticising the Federal Council's information policy in the run-up to federal votes. Since the effect achieved tended towards zero, the Federal Assembly must be accused of neglecting its constitutional mandate in this area.

6 See also Art. 26 "Federal Act on the Federal Assembly": https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2003/510/de#art_26

The sovereign is fighting back and demanding its constitutional and legal rights with this petition!






Imprint & Data Protection


Contact address

Freunde der Verfassung
3000 Bern

E-mail: briefkasten@verfassungsfreunde.ch



The author assumes no liability whatsoever with regard to the correctness, accuracy, up-to-dateness, reliability and completeness of the information.

Liability claims regarding damage caused by the use of any information provided, including any kind of information which is incomplete or incorrect, will therefore be rejected.

All offers are non-binding. The author expressly reserves the right to change, supplement or delete parts of the pages or the entire offer without special notice or to cease publication temporarily or permanently.

Disclaimer for links

References and links to third-party websites are outside our area of responsibility. Any responsibility for such websites is declined. Access to and use of such websites is at the risk of the respective user.


The copyright and all other rights to the content, images, photos or other files on this website belong exclusively to the legal entity Friends of the Constitution or to the specifically named rights holders. The written consent of the copyright holder must be obtained in advance for the reproduction of any element.

Source: SwissAnwalt

Data protection

General note

Based on Article 13 of the Swiss Federal Constitution and the data protection provisions of the Swiss Confederation (Data Protection Act, DPA), every person has the right to protection of their privacy as well as protection against misuse of their personal data. The operators of these pages take the protection of your personal data very seriously. We treat your personal data confidentially and in accordance with the statutory data protection regulations and this data protection declaration.

In cooperation with our hosting providers, we strive to protect the databases as well as possible from unauthorised access, loss, misuse or falsification.

We would like to point out that data transmission on the Internet (e.g. communication by e-mail) can have security gaps. Complete protection of data against access by third parties is not possible.

By using this website, you consent to the collection, processing and use of data as described below. This website can generally be visited without registration. In the process, data such as pages called up or the name of the file called up, date and time are stored on the server for statistical purposes without this data being directly related to your person. Personal data, in particular name, address or e-mail address, are collected on a voluntary basis as far as possible. The data will not be passed on to third parties without your consent.

Processing of personal data

Personal data is any information relating to an identified or identifiable person. A data subject is a person about whom personal data is processed. Processing includes any handling of personal data, regardless of the means and procedures used, in particular the storage, disclosure, acquisition, deletion, storage, modification, destruction and use of personal data.

We process personal data in accordance with Swiss data protection law. Furthermore, we process personal data in accordance with the following legal bases in connection with Art. 6 para. 1 DSGVO - insofar as and to the extent that the EU-DSGVO is applicable:

  • lit. a) Processing of personal data with the consent of the data subject.
  • lit. b) Processing of personal data for the fulfilment of a contract with the data subject as well as for the implementation of corresponding pre-contractual measures.
  • lit. c) processing of personal data to comply with a legal obligation to which we are subject under any applicable law of the EU or under any applicable law of a country in which the GDPR applies in whole or in part.
  • lit. d) Processing of personal data in order to protect the vital interests of the data subject or another natural person.
  • lit. f) Processing of personal data in order to protect the legitimate interests of us or of third parties, provided that the fundamental freedoms and rights and interests of the data subject are not overridden. Legitimate interests are in particular our business interest in being able to provide our website, information security, the enforcement of our own legal claims and compliance with Swiss law.

We process personal data for the period of time required for the respective purpose or purposes. In the case of longer-term retention obligations due to legal and other obligations to which we are subject, we restrict processing accordingly.

Privacy policy for contact form

If you send us enquiries via the contact form, your details from the enquiry form, including the contact details you provide there, will be stored by us for the purpose of processing the enquiry and in the event of follow-up questions. We do not pass on this data without your consent.

Privacy policy for newsletter data

If you would like to receive the newsletter offered on this website, we require an e-mail address from you as well as information that allows us to verify that you are the owner of the e-mail address provided and that you agree to receive the newsletter. No further data will be collected. We use this data exclusively for sending the requested information and do not pass it on to third parties.

You can revoke your consent to the storage of the data, the e-mail address and their use for sending the newsletter at any time, for example via the "unsubscribe link" in the newsletter.


We may amend this privacy policy at any time without prior notice. The current version published on our website will apply. Insofar as the data protection declaration is part of an agreement with you, we will inform you of the change by e-mail or other suitable means in the event of an update.

Questions to the Data Protection Officer

If you have any questions about data protection, please write to us by e-mail or contact the person in our organisation responsible for data protection listed at the beginning of this privacy policy directly.

Bern, 29.07.2020
Source: SwissAnwalt

Shopping cart
  • No products in the cart.