The Federal Council and Parliament
are deceiving its Citizens

Petition for a fair vote


Our demands

The question on the ballot paper concerning the Covid Act is manipulative. The advocates' arguments have been directly incorporated into the wording. Politically and socially significant arguments of the opponents have been completely ignored. This type of manipulation distorts voting behaviour and is unworthy of a direct democracy.


The Federal Council and Parliament have been given a disproportionate amount of print space in which to present their arguments in the voting information pamphlet, compared to the Referendum or Initiative Committee.

  • In the section 'In Brief', the topics 'Background' and 'The Proposal' are introduced with a false illusion of impartiality. In actual fact, this passage is very closely aligned to the advocates' argumentation. In combination with the manipulative wording of the ballot question, the advocates of the Amendment have therefore been able to use about 75 percent of the page spread to advocate for a Yes.
  • In the section 'In detail', the Proposal is meant to be impartially introduced on four pages. The general rule is that advocates and opponents can then each present their positions on two following pages. The information given in this section is biased and suggests that the main objective of the Amendment is financial aid and some other 'minor' changes. The certificate, which would effectively exclude approximately two million Swiss citizens from important aspects of social life, is not once brought to the reader's attention by the use of bold text. Financial aid programmes, which will largely have been completed by March and would not be affected by a No vote, are presented as relevant. This is manipulative and unfair.

In future, the Federal Council and Parliament should refrain from making recommendations on the back page of the pamphlet. Due to the prominence of the Councillors, this has an undue influence on public opinion and creates a bias in citizens' perceptions. Whenever a referendum or an initiative is launched, there is a clear wish on the part of the citizens for political participation and/or the citizens are not in agreement with the laws proposed by Parliament.


We demand our constitutional and legal rights with this petition!

Thank you for joining us.


The Friends of the Constitution submitted the petition "Fairness in the Voting Booklet - Federal Council and Parliament Deceive the Sovereign" in Bern on 24 January 2022. Over 70,000 people are against the manipulative text in the voting booklet.

Comments on the ballot question:

Roger Köppel in Weltwoche Daily, 12 November 2021:

"This is the biggest, manipulative misleading of the voting citizen that I experience. This is a scandal! The text on this ballot paper: massively misleading, massively one-sided, massively manipulative. Not one syllable mentions the Covid certificate. This text is a disgrace for the Swiss Confederation!"

Dr Gerald Brei, lawyer:

"At the beginning of August 2021, the Federal Supreme Court dismissed all voting appeals on the first referendum of 13 June 2021 as inadmissible because the explanatory statements on the vote could not be directly challenged in court. This opens the floodgates for manipulations of all kinds. The Federal Council is exploiting this legal leeway without restraint in order to advertise in a misleading manner the new provisions in the Covid-19 Act, which are unlawful and unconstitutional. Contrary to Art. 34 of the Federal Constitution, a free formation of will and an undistorted casting of votes is thus not possible. The Federal Council's action massively violates the principles of the rule of law (Art. 5 BV). This is a scandal of the first order in terms of constitutional law and democratic politics.

Julian Zaccaron, mountain guide:

"This referendum question is an unparalleled sham. I don't understand how something like this is possible in Switzerland, the model democracy. It is obvious that they want to achieve a yes vote by all means, including deception.

Dr. Klaus Rüdiger, Historian, Advisory Council Friends of the Constitution:

"A free and undistorted formation of opinion is a basic prerequisite for democratic processes. For this, the voting population needs correct information. If the formation of opinion is influenced one-sidedly by a central and official means of information such as the ballot paper, there is a serious democratic theoretical grievance."

Sandro Meier, Economist, Board Friends of the Constitution:

"With this referendum question, Switzerland degrades itself to the level of a banana republic. Obviously, marketing for a bill starts with the name of the bill."

Heidi Joos, Managing Director Avenir50plus, former Cantonal Councillor:

"Misleading and manipulative, the voting question.
No unemployed person will lose even one franc of daily allowance if we vote NO, but they will be spared surveillance and a two-tier society".

Marion Russek, entrepreneur, Co-President Friends of the Constitution:

"I never imagined that a ballot paper in Switzerland could be so misleading!

Our democratic processes are dismantling themselves: this tactic of deceiving the voters is far from transparency and fact-based information.

Imprint & Data Protection


Contact address

Freunde der Verfassung
3000 Bern




The author assumes no liability whatsoever with regard to the correctness, accuracy, up-to-dateness, reliability and completeness of the information.

Liability claims regarding damage caused by the use of any information provided, including any kind of information which is incomplete or incorrect, will therefore be rejected.

All offers are non-binding. The author expressly reserves the right to change, supplement or delete parts of the pages or the entire offer without special notice or to cease publication temporarily or permanently.

Disclaimer for links

References and links to third-party websites are outside our area of responsibility. Any responsibility for such websites is declined. Access to and use of such websites is at the risk of the respective user.


The copyright and all other rights to the content, images, photos or other files on this website belong exclusively to the legal entity Friends of the Constitution or to the specifically named rights holders. The written consent of the copyright holder must be obtained in advance for the reproduction of any element.

Source: SwissAnwalt

Data protection

General note

Based on Article 13 of the Swiss Federal Constitution and the data protection provisions of the Swiss Confederation (Data Protection Act, DPA), every person has the right to protection of their privacy as well as protection against misuse of their personal data. The operators of these pages take the protection of your personal data very seriously. We treat your personal data confidentially and in accordance with the statutory data protection regulations and this data protection declaration.

In cooperation with our hosting providers, we strive to protect the databases as well as possible from unauthorised access, loss, misuse or falsification.

We would like to point out that data transmission on the Internet (e.g. communication by e-mail) can have security gaps. Complete protection of data against access by third parties is not possible.

By using this website, you consent to the collection, processing and use of data as described below. This website can generally be visited without registration. In the process, data such as pages called up or the name of the file called up, date and time are stored on the server for statistical purposes without this data being directly related to your person. Personal data, in particular name, address or e-mail address, are collected on a voluntary basis as far as possible. The data will not be passed on to third parties without your consent.

Processing of personal data

Personal data is any information relating to an identified or identifiable person. A data subject is a person about whom personal data is processed. Processing includes any handling of personal data, regardless of the means and procedures used, in particular the storage, disclosure, acquisition, deletion, storage, modification, destruction and use of personal data.

We process personal data in accordance with Swiss data protection law. We process personal data for the duration required for the respective purpose or purposes. In the case of longer-term retention obligations due to legal and other obligations to which we are subject, we restrict processing accordingly.

Privacy policy for contact form

If you send us enquiries via the contact form, your details from the enquiry form, including the contact details you provide there, will be stored by us for the purpose of processing the enquiry and in the event of follow-up questions. We do not pass on this data without your consent.

Privacy policy for newsletter data

If you would like to receive the newsletter offered on this website, we require an e-mail address from you as well as information that allows us to verify that you are the owner of the e-mail address provided and that you agree to receive the newsletter. No further data will be collected. We use this data exclusively for sending the requested information and do not pass it on to third parties.

You can revoke your consent to the storage of the data, the e-mail address and their use for sending the newsletter at any time, for example via the "unsubscribe link" in the newsletter.


We may amend this privacy policy at any time without prior notice. The current version published on our website will apply. Insofar as the data protection declaration is part of an agreement with you, we will inform you of the change by e-mail or other suitable means in the event of an update.

Questions to the Data Protection Officer

If you have any questions about data protection, please write to us by e-mail or contact the person in our organisation responsible for data protection listed at the beginning of this privacy policy directly.

Bern, 29.07.2020
Source: SwissAnwalt

Shopping cart
  • No products in the cart.